Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 4 de 4
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres

Type de document
Gamme d'année
1.
Journal of Urology ; 209(Supplement 4):e627, 2023.
Article Dans Anglais | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2320414

Résumé

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Psychotropic medications have a significant impact on sexual health. Long-term usage is strongly associated with dyspareunia, decreased libido, hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction. We hypothesized that the prescription rates for psychotropic medications increased in adolescent patients during the COVID-19 pandemic because of the unprecedented stress levels on youth in isolation. Therefore, we evaluated the prescription rates of psychotropic medications as well as concurrent use of PDE5i in adolescent patients during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic era. METHOD(S): We utilized data generated from TriNetX Research Network to conduct a retrospective matched cohort study. Adolescent patients aged 10-19 presenting for outpatient evaluation were placed into two cohorts: 1) outpatient evaluation before and 2) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with prior psychiatric diagnoses and those with prior use of psychotropic medications were excluded. The outcomes of interest were new prescriptions within 90 days of outpatient evaluation. Propensity score matching was performed using logistic regression to build cohorts of equal size. RESULT(S): A total of 1,612,283 adolescents pre-COVID-19 and 1,008,161 adolescents presenting during the COVID-19 pandemic for outpatient evaluations were identified. After propensity matching, a total of 1,005,408 adolescents were included in each cohort each withan average age of 14.7 +/- 2.84 and 52% female and 48% male. Prescribing of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines were more frequent during the pandemic for adolescents (RR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.01-2.2). However, they were less likely to receive antidepressants (Risk Ratio (RR): 0.6, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.57-0.63), anxiolytics (RR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81), stimulants (RR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.25-0.27), as well as mood stabilizers (RR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.39-0.49). Erectile dysfunction requiring oral PDE5i in this cohort was more frequent during the pandemic for adolescents (RR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.05-2.01). CONCLUSION(S): The rates of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine prescriptions increased during the COVID-19 global pandemic compared to preceding years. This coincided with a statistically significant increase in the prescription of PDE5i for erectile dysfunction. Adolescents may face an increased risk of sexual dysfunction as both their illness and the medications they are prescribed both have a positive association with sexual dysfunction. Clinicians must be cognizant of the fact that adolescents may face an increased risk of medication related sexual dysfunction.

2.
J Hosp Infect ; 128: 74-79, 2022 Oct.
Article Dans Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2028204

Résumé

BACKGROUND: Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) can occur through direct, indirect, or close contact with infected people. However, the extent of environmental contamination is unknown. The nature of the relation between patients' symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 environmental shedding remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between patient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status and environmental contamination. METHODS: Between May and November 2020, environmental swabs were taken before and after room disinfection at day 7 after symptom onset in a cohort of patients clinically or biologically diagnosed with COVID-19. Twelve surfaces per room were collected in 13 rooms. Sample analysis was performed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 detection [SARS-CoV-2 R-Gene (biomérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France)]. Clinical data (day of illness, symptoms, RT-PCR results) was collected from the clinical software. RESULTS: Five medical units were included in the study. Of 156 samples collected in 13 rooms, five rooms (38.5%) presented 11 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples. These positive samples were detected on eight different surfaces. There was no association between detection of SARS-CoV-2 and patient age (P=1) or patient symptoms (P=0.3). CONCLUSION: Viral shedding during COVID-19 appears to be unrelated to the presence of symptoms, patient age, and low-value cycle threshold of patient's test. This study supports the evidence for the environmental shedding of SARS-CoV-2 until at least 7 days after symptom onset. It emphasizes the need for strict compliance with contact precautions, hand hygiene, the correct use of personal protective equipment and room disinfection for the routine care of patients with COVID-19.


Sujets)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnostic , Hôpitaux universitaires , Humains , Prévention des infections , Équipement de protection individuelle
3.
Journal of Urology ; 207(SUPPL 5):e358-e359, 2022.
Article Dans Anglais | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1886497

Résumé

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: As of June 2021, three vaccines have been issued Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to combat SARS-CoV-2. However, vaccine hesitancy rates have remained steady with 10.2% of Americans stating they probably not get a vaccine, and 8.2% stating they would definitely not get a vaccine. Thus, we evaluated the current reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the unvaccinated U.S. population. METHODS Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) was used to survey the unvaccinated U.S. adult population between June 30 - July 1, 2021. The survey was available to complete for individuals above the age of 18 located in the United States who never received any COVID-19 vaccine at any time. The anonymous 32-question survey focused on identifying perceptions toward COVID-19 vaccination and potential factors that may encourage uptake. Demographic information such as age, race/ethnicity, and relationship status were collected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 914 adults responded to our survey with 53% of respondents identifying as cis-male and 42% as cis-female. When assessing reasons why individuals have elected against vaccination, we found that 58% are worried about unknown long term adverse effects (Figure 1A). Of these, 41% believed the 'COVID-19 vaccines can negatively impact reproductive health and or fertility, and 38% were unsure of the effects on fertility (Figure 1B). In addition, 48% of all unvaccinated respondents said additional information and research conducted on COVID-19 vaccines would encourage vaccination while only 11% of them claimed that financial incentives would encourage them. CONCLUSIONS: Using Amazon MTurk, we demonstrated that fertility concerns constitute a significant barrier to vaccine uptake among the unvaccinated U.S. population. In addition, we found that more information and research conducted on the COVID-19 vaccines would encourage vaccination among all unvaccinated respondent in addition to those fearful of fertility side effects. Such information may be of immense use to public health officials in promoting COVID-19 vaccine uptake and protecting the U.S. population amidst this global pandemic.

4.
Fertility and Sterility ; 116(3 SUPPL):e297, 2021.
Article Dans Anglais | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1880282

Résumé

OBJECTIVE: Fertility related safety data was neither reported in the clinical trials nor evaluated in animal models prior to emergency use authorization (EUA) for two novel mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 and mRNA-127.1,2 Despite excellent safety profiles for both vaccines, 44% of Americans are hesitant in receiving the vaccine. Although the specific reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy are unknown, concerns over fertility has previously decreased other vaccine uptake. As COVID-19 vaccination in the United States opens to children and adolescents, evaluating any potential impact of the vaccine on male reproduction is imperative for public reassurance. We hypothesized that since both vaccines only contain mRNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein without biologic ability to replicate live virus, the vaccines would not decrease semen parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study after IRB approval from the University of Miami (#20201451). Healthy men aged 18-50 scheduled for mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in Miami, Florida were recruited.Participants provided a semen sample after 2-7 days of abstinence, prior to receiving the first dose of either vaccine and about 72 days after the second dose. Specimens were self-collected into a wide-mouth sterile container and semen analysis (SA) performed by HCLD trained andrology clinicians examined semen volume, concentration, motility, and total motile sperm count (TMSC). RESULTS: 45 men provided a semen sample. Neither median sperm concentration nor total motile sperm count (TMSC) declined post vaccination (Figure 1). There was no clinically significant change in TMSC. Only 12 (26.6%) men had a marginal decrease in TMSC. In fact, the remaining 33 (73.3%) men demonstrated normal sperm parameters. Importantly, 8 (17%) men with oligospermia prior to vaccination did not experience a decrease in spermatogenesis. Only one subject had an abnormal TMSC (TMSC ≤ 9) after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: After receiving the two doses of the vaccines, we did not observe a clinically significant sperm parameter decline within the cohort, suggesting the vaccines do not negatively impact male fertility potential. IMPACT STATEMENT: This is the first male fertility evaluation of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, in which we found that the vaccines do not negatively impact semen parameters. (Table Presented).

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche